Week 21 · learning day 2
AI fundamentals
Introduction to Data Science and Analytics · 45–60 minutes
Today’s outcomes
- Explain ai fundamentals in the context of introduction to data science and analytics.
- Compare a product decision using the source outcome rather than intuition alone.
- Produce a reusable section of an analytics decision brief.
Source trace
W21-O02Explain the concept of artificial intelligence.
Core lesson
Make the choice inspectable
AI fundamentals matters when it changes a real allocation of attention, money, time, or delivery capacity. Analytics turns product behaviour into evidence for a specific decision.
Start by naming the decision and the uncertainty around it. Separate evidence from assumptions, compare at least one alternative, and state what would make you revise the choice.
The source outcome for today is: Explain the concept of artificial intelligence.
What decision will ai fundamentals improve, what evidence is sufficient for that decision, and what is the cost of being wrong?
Worked example
AI fundamentals in practice
For a usage-insights product for account teams, the product manager must compare a choice about ai fundamentals. The team records the target user and outcome, the evidence currently available, the strongest alternative, and the next reversible test. The recommendation is written as a choice with a reason—not as a list of features.
Do the work · 20 minutes
Turn the idea into a decision
- Choose a product you know and write the specific decision that ai fundamentals should support.
- List two pieces of evidence, two assumptions, and one credible alternative.
- Make a recommendation in three sentences and add one condition that would change it.
Save to your portfolio
An analytics decision brief — section: AI fundamentals
Knowledge check
Answer before opening
What is the decision at the centre of ai fundamentals?
A good answer names an accountable choice, not merely an activity or output.
How should evidence and assumptions be separated?
Label observed facts, interpretations, and untested beliefs explicitly so the next learning step is visible.
What makes the recommendation revisable?
It includes a trigger, threshold, or new evidence that would justify changing course.
What should the portfolio artefact communicate?
The context, considered alternatives, chosen direction, rationale, evidence, and remaining risk.
Spaced review
Reconnect the learning
Reflection